Microsoft MB2-708 Questions Answers

You have a deployment of Dynamics CRM 2015 that contains two organizations. One of the organizations is integrated with Microsoft SharePoint Server 2013. The deployment contains several Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services (SSRS) reports that are scheduled to run regularly. You install the Microsoft Dynamics CRM VSS Writer server role.
What are two types of content that the Microsoft Dynamics CRM VSS Writer role enables you to back up and restore? Each correct answer presents a complete solution.

A. The Dynamics CRM organization databases
B. The SSRS databases that are used for the Microsoft Dynamics CRM Reporting Extensions
C. The Microsoft SharePoint Server databases that are integrated with Microsoft Dynamics CRM
D. The Dynamics CRM configuration database
E. The Internet Information Services (IIS) metabase

Answer: AD

Microsoft MB2-708 Questions Answers

You plan to configure an Internet-facing deployment of Dynamics CRM 2015.
What is the maximum number of HTTPS bindings you can configure?

A. 1
B. 4
C. 5
D. 9

Answer: A


You have a deployment of Dynamics CRM 2015.
You recently moved the configuration database to a Microsoft SQL Server cluster.
You need to ensure that the Dynamics CRM 2015 deployment uses the new location for the configuration database.
What should you do?

A. From SQL Server Management Studio, modify the security roles.
B. From Deployment Manager, modify the organization settings.
C. From the Windows Registry, modify the data source.
D. From Windows PowerShell, run the Edit-CRMConfiguration cmdlet.

Answer: B

Microsoft MB2-708 Question Answer

You have an Internet-facing deployment of Dynamics CRM 2015 that contains only one server.
Users report that they must add the TCP port number to the URL in the Internet Explorer address bar to access the Dynamics CRM server. You need to provide to the users a simple URL that does not contain the TCP port. What should you do?

A. From the Dynamics CRM server, create a host header.
B. From each user's computer, add the URL to the Local intranet zone.
C. From Active Directory, deploy a Group Policy object (GPO).
D. From the Dynamics CRM server, modify the port settings of the default website.

Answer: A

You have a deployment of Dynamics CRM 2015 that contains multiple organizations.
You need to limit the number of systems jobs that can be queued for a single organization.
What should you do?

A. From the web application, modify the system settings.
B. From Deployment Manager, modify the organization settings.
C. From Windows PowerShell, run the Set-CRMAdvancedSettings cmdlet
D. From Windows PowerShell, run the Edit-CRMOrganization cmdlet.

Answer: C

Microsoft MB2-708 Question Answer

You are asked to identify the benefits of performing an in-place upgrade instead of a migration that uses a new instance of Microsoft SQL Server.
Which two benefits should you identify? Each answer presents part of the solution.

A. Easiest to recover if a database failure occurs
B. Minimizes hardware costs
C. Easiest to perform
D. Minimizes downtime

Answer: BC


You have a deployment of Dynamics CRM 2013 that contains four computers. The computers are configured as shown in the following table.

You plan to upgrade to Dynamics CRM 2015.
You need to identify on which computer the operating system must be upgraded.
Which computer should you identify?

A. CRM1
B. CRM2
C. CRM3
D. SQL1

Answer: A

Collaboration Trends 2018: Expect Microsoft Teams To Gain Ground, Enterprises To Embrace Group Chat

After several years of rapid feedback from users, collaboration software has become an increasingly integral part of how work is organized and carried out. As more companies rely on tools like Slack, Microsoft Teams and others, IT leaders are looking to deploy a new class of collaborative tools across the enterprise to boost productivity and connect disparate teams.

During 2017, team collaboration software matured as a business option with the launch of the Slack business edition for large-scale deployments and Microsoft launched Teams to put group chat in the hands of many Office 365 subscribers. Numerous other providers they mobilized to capitalize on the opportunity created by Slack with their own group chat offers, such as Atlassian's Stride, even when Cisco and Facebook continued to build their existing platforms.

"The collaboration is hot, it will stay warm," said IDC research director Wayne Kurtzman. "Collaboration platforms represent the opportunity for digital disruption, they are driven people, use new behavioral metrics and positively affect standard commercial KPIs, and that trend will continue."

The scenario is now ready for a competitive market as more companies invest in software to connect their employees. "We are still ahead in terms of companies that have enterprise-wide deployments, but they will see in 2018 that there will be a good deal of momentum behind the large-scale deployments," said Irwin Lazar, vice president and services director of Nemertes Research.

Group chat as the center of productivity of the office

One of the main trends that emerged in the last year is that group chat is quickly becoming the center of productivity.

That is reflected in the strategy of several unified communications providers, said Lazar. For example, Microsoft plans to phase out Skype for Business, and computers will gradually become their primary communications tool. And RingCentral acquired Glip to make it its main communications client.

"When team collaboration applications used to look like an adjunct, now you're starting to see a lot of applications going into them," Lazar said. "If I'm working with my team, I live in the team's application, but if I want to share a document, I share it in the team's application." If I want to open an application, I release it, potentially even through the team's application. that becomes the digital center of the workplace. "

Video conferencing is another aspect of communication that is being incorporated into team collaboration platforms, and screen sharing is also becoming more advanced, said Richard Edwards, director of services and distinguished analyst at Freeform Dynamics.

"The most important aspect of [change] to 2018 is the ability to switch between short messages and perhaps some attachments to be able to enter a group conference call and maybe even scale that up and do some screen sharing and bring in a lot of third parties. more easily than would be the case today, "said Edwards.

Despite an increasingly competitive market, the large-scale integrated adoption of collaboration tools at the corporate level has yet to be done. Most companies are using these tools in silos on all computers, with little strategic planning around who uses what. A group of developers could be using a tool, for example, while the marketing department is using another.

That probably changes as the team's collaboration becomes more popular; IT administrators will have to adopt a more thought-out approach to implementations.

"It's starting to change," said Lazar. "The conversations that I am having with IT leaders are that they are starting to try to think a little more proactively and want to plan the implementation of these applications in the next year or two."

Helping to drive this type of investment decisions: the understanding by companies that they are beginning to reap the benefits of connecting equipment and facilitating the exchange of information and ideas.

"They see the value, they see that collaborating in the context of a team space is much easier than trying to use e-mail," said Lazar. "It's much more intuitive [and] aligns with the needs of mobile workers ... The context of being able to converse within a space reserved for a specific topic, instead of having to have everything sitting in your inbox, it's just a much better way to work. "
Slack's challenge: attract large corporations

In many ways, Slack is responsible for the growing interest in group chat, which is reflected in the company's impressive growth. In September, the company announced that it has 6 million daily active users, compared to 5 million in January, and $ 200 million in annual revenue. The number of people who pay for their services has also increased. This summer, the company reached 50,000 paid equipment users, compared to 38,000 in January, and 2 million paid individual users, compared to 1.5 million at the beginning of the year.

Earlier this year, Slack began to actively focus on deployments in large companies with the launch of its Enterprise Grid product. The business edition includes advanced security controls and administrative and user functions for an unlimited number of workspaces. It is designed to support implementations in companies with tens of thousands of employees with separate but connected workspaces.

Convincing more users to adopt the service is the next big challenge.

"At the moment, the only thing that is holding Slack in the company is what has made them popular at this point, and that is sold by team by team," said Gartner research director Larry Cannell. "When you sell to a bigger company, you have to sell it to a company, and your Grid product is trying to do that, which is an incredibly important product for them to stay and grow within the company."

Slack also has other concerns, such as a lot of rivals trying to catch up and launch their own team tools that in many ways mimic the Slack interface. This includes Atlassian Stride, Zoho Cliq and, of course, Microsoft teams. The teams reach general availability in March of this year and have the strongest credentials to become a "slack assassin". Although there are weaknesses in the platform compared to Slack, as a possibly more complex interface, Microsoft has a clear advantage with its Office 365 integration.

Microsoft Teams gain momentum

"The dynamics of the market that we have seen in the last year is that Microsoft has the momentum, for the simple reason that we see the percentage of companies that use Office 365 and it is very high," said Lazar.

"Because Teams is free with an E3 or E5 license, it's very difficult for someone like Slack to say, 'Hey, you have to pay us for the Enterprise Grid product.'"

Business customers are doing two calculations. One implies cost, said Lazar. The other involves Microsoft's decision to integrate teams closely into Office 365, "to the point where I can enter a team space and look at a document in which my team is working and edit it directly within that team space."

It is also possible to co-direct documents. "So they could be editing a document together while we're chatting, or if we need to talk live, we click on a link and now we have an open voice channel between us," he said.

"Those are the kind of things that Slack and Spark and really all the other competing products can not do, because they do not have that tight integration with Microsoft Office environments." So, for companies that are collaborating a lot with the documents of Office, it's hard to beat the teams. "

Even so, Slack is likely to remain the preferred team collaboration tool for many, especially in companies that are not closely linked to Microsoft, or that are considering Slack's ability to integrate with Oracle, SAP, Salesforce and other applications. CRM provide a central workspace, said Lazar.


Cannell de Gartner agreed that Microsoft will be a major player in the market in the next year: "The collaboration market is looking over their shoulders in Office 365 and they are trying to discover what their weaknesses are and where they can compete against he and where are the gaps that could fill ".

Google and Facebook make their own movements

Google announced its own Slack competitor this year, splitting its Hangouts platform into two products: Meet, a dedicated video conferencing tool, and Chat, which supports group conversations and links to G Suite files.

"If Google follows their plans with Hangouts Chat and integrates them with their team units, it could have a strong offer of team collaboration," said Cannell. "At the moment, I think Google is a bit behind the market when it comes to team collaboration."

While Google has a strong portfolio of productivity and file sharing as part of G Suite, a tool like Google Docs is currently focusing more on making personal documents available to colleagues, rather than supporting more advanced collaboration.

"Whereas if you look at Slack, Slack creates a team space where we have a team conversation, and Microsoft Teams also creates a team conversation, but also a team file exchange and a team repository space," Cannell said. . "So I think Google has something to do with the team's collaboration space."

Facebook, which has a slightly different approach to collaboration with its business social network Workplace, also continues to evolve. One year after its official launch, Workplace is now used by 30,000 companies. That list includes retail giant Walmart, a major customer victory announced in September, and Virgin Atlantic.

The airline launched Workplace at approximately the same time in an attempt to improve the exchange of information between front-line personnel and senior executives. It currently serves primarily as an intranet for internal communications, although the company plans to integrate other applications and processes over time.

Since its launch, Workplace has seen better adoption than expected, according to Virgin Atlantic CIO and senior vice president of technology at Don Langford. Virgin Atlantic now has 7,000 people in the workplace, an adoption rate of around 70%.

With so many options and features underway or evolving, companies looking for a unique collaboration platform may have to make some difficult decisions.

"Many [collaboration] companies are already focusing on features that will help differentiate them from the others," Kurtzman said. "Who has the best set of features can change from month to month, so you may have to choose the company that has the vision that best suits the changing needs of your company."

Microsoft MB2-708 Question Answer

You need to identify which type of file is used to store the definition for Dynamics CRM reports. Which file type should you identify?

A. RDL
B. VSPX
C. SQL
D. RDLX

Answer: A


You are planning a deployment of Dynamics CRM 2015 and Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services (SSRS). Dynamics CRM and SSRS will be installed on different servers.
You need to recommend a solution to ensure that Dynamics CRM can use SSRS without requiring
Kerberos double-hop authentication.
What should you include in the recommendation?

A. Anonymous authentication mode in Microsoft Internet Information Services (OS)
B. Microsoft Kerberos Configuration Manager
C. Dynamics CRM 2015 Reporting Extensions
D. Microsoft Dynamics CRM Report Authoring Extension

Answer: D

Why Microsoft Isn’t The Smartphone Leader It Should Be

Earlier this year, I read a piece on ArsTechnica about Microsoft's annual shareholder meeting in which many attendees expressed their belief to CEO Satya Nadella that Microsoft had ceded control of the smartphone market to Apple and Google and had No longer a serious competitor.

A shareholder who uses Windows Phone, Dana Vance, expressed dismay that Microsoft had launched certain applications on iOS and Android before Windows 10 Mobile. Vance also raised the claims that the development of the Microsoft band had been discontinued.

Another audience member was more compelling, and asked Nadella directly if Microsoft was committed to Windows Mobile.

A slow and steady decline

So, here's the thing. Eons ago, Microsoft was one of the market leaders when it came to mobile productivity. This was before Steve Jobs even had conceived the iPhone. At that time, the smartphone race was hard hit between four main players: Palm, BlackBerry, Symbian and Microsoft. Windows Mobile 6 - Microsoft's offer - had a respectable market share of around 30 percent.

Windows Mobile did well with overworked and financial managers who wanted a convenient way of accessing their emails and typing in office documents, but their popular appeal was limited. The vast majority of phones were simply too monotonous and awkward for most ordinary consumers to even consider buying from them.

But in 2007, it all went to shit for Microsoft. Apple launched the iPhone, and in turn transformed the smartphone market into something that had not been seen before.

The iPhone was a phone that allowed people to get shit while looking at the part. It was the first smartphone truly aspiration. Everyone from teenagers to executives wanted their hands on one. And shortly after Google revealed Android, it allowed companies like Samsung and HTC to offer similar functionality to iPhone, but at a fraction of the cost.

At that time, the final nail in the coffin of Windows Phone 6 had been almost hammered. It began to bleed users. Microsoft tried to stop the flow with Windows Mobile 6.5, which worked a bit better on phones just touch and had a better browser, but it was not enough.

By the time the company released its first modern smartphone - Windows Phone 7 - Microsoft's global share had been reduced to a fraction of what it was in 2005. This was a deeply humbling moment for a company that had dominated the World of computing since the early 1990s.

Despite the subsequent releases of Windows Phone 8, Windows Phone 8.1 and Windows Mobile 10, Microsoft has never recovered in the mobile space.
It should not be like that

The most tragic of Microsoft's unstoppable uncontrolled mobile is that it feels completely unnecessary.

There is literally no reason why Microsoft - a company with vast financial resources and some of the most talented developers and researchers in the world on its payroll - must fight this way.

Perhaps the biggest reason Windows Phone (and later Windows Mobile) suffocated was that there was a void of consumer enthusiasm. Nobody cared. What most frustrates me is that there were things that Microsoft could have done (and in fact, can do) to change this.

The sophisticated application store
Let's address the ten-ton elephant in the room: the app store. At this time, the main reason why you should not buy a Windows phone is that there is a real drought of the applications. Worse, from the dispersion of existing applications, many of them have not received an update in a long time.

Directly out the door, Microsoft should have taken a sheet out of RIM's book and offered some serious financial incentives to developers.

Yes, I know that in 2013 he offered briefly to pay developers a whopping $ 100 for each newly released application. Yes, I know there were some private (and strong) financial incentives given to large companies such as Foursquare.

Clearly, these were not enough, and were not maintained to ensure that these applications had parity of features with their Android and iOS equivalents.
Taking Control of Hardware

Former Microsoft CEO Steven Ballmer has some pretty strong ideas on this subject. He (rightfully so) thinks that Microsoft should have gotten into the hardware game faster. Doing so would have allowed Microsoft to release phones where it can exert control over all aspects of the device, just as Apple is with the iPhone.

This makes perfect sense. During the brief days of Windows Phone, there were a handful of devices running the software from a variety of manufacturers, including Nokia, Blu, HTC, Alcatel and ZTE.

Many of them were, at first glance, quite identical. In terms of industrial design and internal specifications, there was not much to choose from. On the other hand, it is difficult to differentiate between a Windows Phone device and an Android device because Microsoft only allows a certain amount of software customization.

From the consumer's point of view, this was rather confusing. I guess many people took a look at the then dizzying ecosystem of Windows Phone devices and quickly gave up, instead of choosing to spend their money on an Android or iPhone.

In hindsight, buying Nokia was a great idea. The Finnish mobile icon made great phones. Their industrial design was top notch, and perhaps they were the most visible and compromised manufacturer of Windows devices.

The biggest mistake made by Microsoft was its inertia to remove the Nokia brand and take control of the Windows Phone ecosystem.

When you bought the company in 2014, you should have immediately stopped licensing your software and instead you are committed to launching three phones per year: a low-end device, a mid-range device and a premium device.

This would have allowed Microsoft to take a holistic look at how people use their devices, and allow them to take the same detailed-oriented approach to the user experience that Apple takes with the iPhone.

Microsoft can make incredible hardware. This fact has been tested time and again with the likes of Xbox One, Surface, Surface Book and Surface Studio. Imagine what it would be like if the only Windows phones on the market were a range of attractive and well-constructed surface phones.
Microsoft should have put on its dream cap

In the last five years, Microsoft has evolved from a company obsessed with making incremental improvements to its software, to one that is fundamentally adventurous and obsessed with the new and undiscovered. Hololens anyone?

But this has not really materialized on the mobile front.

I have a theory about this. Since 2007, when Apple launched the iPhone, Microsoft has been playing catchup. He has been so obsessed with ensuring that things work and that the essential features are present, he has not been able to take his vision for things like augmented reality to his mobile product.

From the beginning, Microsoft should have explored how it can differentiate its mobile offer from Apple and Google. I should have been bold. It was not, and today Windows Phone languishes like a smartphone OS also running.

The last hurray?

There were other things I wanted to mention. I wanted to bring confusion, inconsistent branding (note how many times I switch between Windows Phone and Windows Mobile in this article). I desperately wanted to praise about how I thought the platform was poorly marketed. But time is short, and not only was there not the column inches.

Some of you will read my article and write furiously a comment about how I am "a bias" and an Apple fanatic. You would be wrong. Not that it matters, but this Monday I bought a Dell XPS 13, and during my life I have owned four different Windows phones. As a platform, I have given you many opportunities. Maybe more than it deserves.

But time is running out for Microsoft's mobile ambitions. Microsoft is rumored to be working on a surface phone. Satya Nadella says that this will be the "ultimate mobile device". Will this be the last hurray of the company before it eventually consigned to build applications and services for the other two big holders?

Maybe. But I hope not.

I am a perennial optimist, and as a result I have not written Windows 10 Mobile quite yet. I think if Microsoft somehow manages to convince developers to return to the platform, and if they can build a device that can compete with the current range of desirable flagships, then perhaps - just maybe - will have a chance .